See moreħ Awesome CSS3 Techniques You Should give a TryĮarlier developers used to face a lot of difficulties aligning a text or any other element vertically center. D3 also provides seamless compatibility with React and has a variety of features which would make the data we produce visually pleasing. This library is the most popular data visualization library for React with over 80k stars on Github. To display data in tasteful manner, we have chosen to use the D3.js library. The Material UI library provides us with minimal and aesthetically pleasing React Components which would make our frontend look pleasing to the user.įinally, our UI will consist of displaying information from our Machine Learning model in a dashboard type view. To design the UI, using a minimal approach would be the best solution.
Since we're using React, we will also be using JavaScript, HTML, and CSS to create the frontend. Being able to reuse React components will help in developing the product fast as well as making the user interface modular. React also has multiple open source libraries to ease our development. React provides us with simplicity to allow us to deliver the MVP as soon as possible. The stack chosen for the interface of our product includes: JavaScript + React, CSS, HTML, Material UI and D3.js. With this is mind, it is important to build a clean, readable web interface that a user will be able to navigate easily and quickly debug their security issues.
The key to our product relies on explainability and user experience when using our product. I've been finding myself building entire pages without writing a single line of css.Īnd if later on, the designer wants to make a change to some color, or size, I just need to change one value in the config file, and the entire app is updated. If you go with pure css and build your own components, I can't recommend tailwind enough, If you choose options one, then it's just a matter of deciding what style you like (material,ant, bulma) and go with the library that implements it Might take time to get used to and takes more time since you need to build the components Most flexible, mix and match classes as you like and build your own markup Takes more time since you need to build the components You are bound to Bulma classes and markup. Need to learn the react framework and the bulma styles, and it's harder to customize to your needsĪ pure css framework, like Bulma, where you write all the components yourself.Ī lot of flexibility to build the components you need Having a lot of pre-built UI components saves a lot of time Here's a link to Bootstrap's open source repository on GitHub.Īccording to the StackShare community, Bootstrap has a broader approval, being mentioned in 7047 company stacks & 1101 developers stacks compared to HTML5, which is listed in 3136 company stacks and 3373 developer stacks.Īctually it really depends on your needs, there are 3 types of UI frameworks you can use: "Responsiveness", "UI components" and "Consistent" are the key factors why developers consider Bootstrap whereas "New doctype", "Local storage" and "Canvas" are the primary reasons why HTML5 is favored.īootstrap is an open source tool with 134K GitHub stars and 65.8K GitHub forks. The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997.īootstrap and HTML5 are primarily classified as "Front-End Frameworks" and "Languages" tools respectively. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. On the other hand, HTML5 is detailed as " 5th major revision of the core language of the World Wide Web".
Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web. Bootstrap vs HTML5: What are the differences?ĭevelopers describe Bootstrap as " Simple and flexible HTML, CSS, and JS for popular UI components and interactions".
0 kommentar(er)
